Case Study Applying Humanistic Theory of Personality

Theory of Choice Article Selection: Humanistic Approach to Education Markeeta R. Summers Capella University June 4, 2011 Rationale 1. We all have the power to choose our destinies 2. client centered therapy 3. The approach attempts to help people gain control of their lives and make positive choices about their direction Humanistic psychologists are different from psychodynamic theorists because they indicate that our lives are not completely determined by genetics, past experiences, or our present circumstance. Humanistic psychology is inspired by psychoanalysis but is independent from it in the view of personal freedom as a contrast to psychic determinism. We all have the power to choose our destinies, even when fate†¦show more content†¦How the article applies to education: Educators play a huge role in helping to develop a childs self esteem. Children need to feel good about themselves and need to feel that they have the ability to set and reach goals. Education that is based on humanists approach allows the teacher to be the facilitator. Children are actively involved in learning which assists in moving toward self actualization. Maslow, A.H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review 50, 370-96—this article details the five basic needs. We are beings of want and in all of our wants we are partially satisfied and partially unsatisfied. The article discusses motivations for behavior and how Maslow’s hierarchy plays a part in these motivations. How the article applies to education: Maslow believed that motivation was an individual’s drive for growth. Learning will not occur if a student does not meet the basic needs. Physiological needs must be met along wit safety. If a student has been well fed and does not feel threatened by anyone or anything in the school environment they will be more motivated to learn as in most cases students gain a higher sense of self esteem from their learning progress. Patterson, C.H. (1977). Insights about Persons : Psychological Foundations of Humanistic and Affective Education. Washington, DC, Association for Supervision and Curriculum -- In this article it is explained that educationsShow MoreRelatedMaslows Biological Factors vs Humanistic Theory1272 Words   |  6 Pageshierarchy of needs to discuss the extent to which growth needs influence personality formation, also describe biological factors that influence the formation of personality. Examine the relationship of biological factors to Maslow’s theory of personality, explained the basic aspect of humanistic theory that are incompatible with biological explanations of personality. Abraham Maslow developed the hierarchy of needs theory still remain valid today for understanding human motivation, management trainingRead MoreApplying Learning Theory Of Life1507 Words   |  7 Pages Applying Learning Theory to Life Kristen Lewis PSY331: Psychology of Learning Nina Dulabaum 2 Feb 2015 Introduction: Learning can be defined as a lasting change in behavior of an entity that is down to the experience gained by the entity. The basic purpose of this paper is to apply the learning principles to by presenting and teaching the information to others in the workforce, to help people learn in the best way. We have to choose the best methods and best principles of learningRead MoreHumanistic Psychology Essay1631 Words   |  7 Pagesof this paper is the person-centered approach, which is the understanding of personality and human relationships in psychotherapy and counseling in the areas of client-centered therapy, education of student-centered learning, organizations, and other group settings. Even though psychoanalysis and behaviorism have made major contributions to psychology, it has influenced the understanding and practices of the humanistic movement, specifically with the therapies for the different mental disorders.Read MoreHumanistic Theory, Psychodynamic Theory And Cbt1373 Words   |  6 Pages Here I am going to explain the key characteristics of: Humanistic theory, Psychodynamic theory and CBT. Firstly I am going to talk about what I think the Humanistic theory is, this approach works by providing the client with a better understand of themselves. It helps them to understand their feelings and gives them a chance to explore the option to create personal choices. Humanistic therapy is used for depression, low self-esteem, anxiety, stress, loss etc. It pushes the client to work towardsRead MoreA Summary of the Psychodynamic Theory and Sigmund Freuds Ideas1826 Words   |  7 PagesIt is difficult to summarize psychodynamic theory without a brief discussion of Freud. Sigmund Freud is the father of psychoanalysis, the father of psychodynamic theory, and in effect the father of modern psychotherapy. Freuds notions retain quite a bit of popularity, especially his ideas that things are not what they seem on the surface. Because of his understanding of the mind and behavior, Freud considered that overt behaviors were not always self-explanatory (or perhaps not often explanatoryRead MoreAbnormal Psychology - Behaviour That Is Not Socially Acceptable962 Words   |  4 PagesDefinitions and Examples of Abnormal Psychology Behaviour that is not socially acceptable Science of learning how biological changes affect personality behaviour Prolonged or repeated psychological state that is harmful to the individual or others Person with an illness, on medication, deviates from the norm Study of illnesses, mental disorders that the DSM-IV does not recognize as normal Myths and Misconceptions No single definition of psychologicalRead MoreSchool of Thoughts in Psychology1604 Words   |  7 PagesWundt. Almost immediately, other theories began to emerge and vie for dominance in psychology. The following are some of the major schools of thought that have influenced our knowledge and understanding of psychology: Structuralism was the first school of psychology, and focused on breaking down mental processes into the most basic components. Major structuralist thinkers include Wilhelm Wundt and Edward Titchener. Functionalism formed as a reaction to the theories of the structuralist school of thoughtRead MoreStructuralism And The Development Of Psychology874 Words   |  4 Pagesto study the structure of the human mind (Edward B. Titchener) functionalism- from an evolutionary process, a school of psychology is focused on how mental and behavioral processes function Behavioral- an objective form of science that studies behavior without reference to mental process b) Gestalt- Max Wertheimer sought to explain perceptions in terms of results rather than by analyzing their constituents c)Psychoanalytic/psychodynamic-Sigmund Freud revolutionized psychology with his theory ofRead MoreEssay on Personality: the Oprah Winfrey Show837 Words   |  4 Pagesrequires that you apply the material that you have studied during the term to a case study of your choice. For this assignment, you must choose a well-known current or historical person for an in-depth analysis of personality development. Some examples of the type of person you can choose are famous politicians, philanthropists, entertainers, businesspersons, or individuals who made significant contributions to your field of study or career. You should choose a figure whose biographical information canRead MoreMaslows Theory1321 Words   |  6 PagesTheorist’s Biography Abraham Harold Maslow, the founder of humanistic psychology, was born in New York City on April 1, 1908 and died at home in California in 1970 (Maslow, Abraham Hutchinson Encyclopedia of Biography, 2010) (Abraham H. Maslow: a Bibliography: Professional biography, 1970). He received his AB, MA, and PhD in psychology from the University of Wisconsin (1970). His work as a United States (U.S.) psychologist started in 1932 after he started working as a teaching fellow (1970). Maslow

Personal Narrative My Old Babysitter - 1456 Words

Recently I heard some troublesome gossip about my old babysitter which made me somewhat pensive. So being a judicious type, I decided to write in my journal, recounting a particular chapter during a summer morning; bookmarked in my long-term memory. During the school holidays in my tenth summer, I was lying under the garden tree (which happen to be an apple tree) staring at a single Worcester pearmain that was eclipsing the sun as zephyr tenderly rocked it back and forth; giving it a seductive allure, while I was thinking about the previous night. Mother and father were having an agitated discussion downstairs in the living room. Sitting on my bed not able to sleep; listening to the muffled nouns and verbs fencing between them, until my†¦show more content†¦Surely the apple I m looking at must have a gold one? Was the idea that came to a mind not yet limited by conventional means; but a child s jejune, like an original scribble. Beside me, parked in the two-week pre-cut grass, were my matchbox cars. Three police cars and a red Ferrari Mondial were ready for today s episode. From time to time I ll go and play with those cars and fantasize the uneven duality between the good guys and the bad men. Although the criminal in these imaginings was not a villain; his motives for the crimes were somewhat chivalrous, whereas the police had a fraudulent agenda. The misunderstood hero in a Robin Hood fashion would steal from the corrupt and give to the desolate; escaping from high-speed chases in a Ferrari, ransacking the tall concrete bank towers, which overshadow shanty towns in a totalitarian city, controlled by the decadent; throwing a brick to their Murano glass chandelier way of life. Once my father referred the police as pigs so I also incorporated the image into my playing; the police were evil humanoid pig creatures wearing man masks always outfought by the hero. It s quite jocose when I reminisce about it now, and I m sure it s common among young lads that they would often think of themselves as the hero with a strong mature body; I know I did. The acts of heroism would never be the act of violence, so I would employ the antics of laughter. Such as

Project Management Methodology by Kerzner & Kerzner - Samples

Question: Discuss about the Project Management Methodology by Kerzner Kerzner. Answer: Introduction: Kerzner Kerzner (2017) definedproject management methodology as the model for achieving project objectives like planning, design, implementation and achievement.Project anagement methodology is the way of organizing the tasks defined in the project and bound the tasks in a time schedule. The methodology is the model that serves the project a better result while controlling the output of the project. According to Schwalbe (2015),project management methodology is the fancy way of describing a project activity framework. The framework is the way of planning the timeline of the tasks and allocating resources to the tasks so that all the activities can be completed successfully. In order to have a better project result, the tasks within a project needs to be defined an organized manner (Joslin Muller, 2015). The project management methodology is the framework that permits the project manager to have track of the processes of the project activities and controlling the processes. Differen t projects have different objectives and characteristics. Based on the characteristics and objective of the project aproject management methodology is chosen (Turner, 2016). Therefore, the project management is the model of fulfilling a projects objective and maintaining the power over the project outcome on the hand of project manager. Difference between PMBOK and Prince 2: Difference: The project management body of knowledge or PMBOK is designed to include all the information and knowledge that are related to project management concept. The Prince2 is the procedure and methodology designed to handle a project within any private or public sector or industries that enhances the possibilities of successful project management results. The total number of credentials holders of PMI are 600,000 worldwide. Total number of credentials holders of Prince2 in the whole world is 1,000,000. The project management body of knowledge or PMBOK is the guide is designed with the purpose of assisting practitioners to identify the general process of the project management practice. Then it also assists in understanding the techniques of the project management application. Considering the PMBOK as the general text book of project management is not the right thing to do. This implies the idea of guiding a project management staff rather than posing as a methodology. The Prince2, on the other hand, is a methodology for planning and controlling a project irrespective of the size of project. The Prince2 is considered to be a structured procedure that combines elements of the project for reducing the project risk. The biggest strength of PMBOK is that it offers a complete process that is defined step-by-step on handling a project. It provides guidance of interpersonal skills and leadership. Moreover, the PMBOK lists a certain amount of techniques and tools that can be used for particular process knowledge. The strength of Prince2 is that it allows the project manager to align the project to the business objectives and requirements throughout the lifecycle. It is consisting of the approach called Product Based Planning as well as concentrate on achieving those planned outcomes. The roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders are clearly defined in the Prince2. Similarities: Both the PMBOK and Prince2 can be used to understand a project and planning for any kind and size of project. Both are the best practices of project management. Both of these are very helpful in doing the project management in right manner. Prince2 Project Management Processes: Starting up Project: In this phase, the project staff are selected. The selection of the staff are done based on the project characteristics, only the skilled expert personnel will be selected. Then the project will be created. The project approach are shared with the stakeholders and agreed upon. At last the project planning is initiated. Initiating a Project: In this phase, the project planning is continued. The project palling is documented and shared among the stakeholders. Then the business case is disused among the project manager and project staff. The risks are also identified in this phase. The project controls are set. At last the planning for the next phase in the project is done. Directing a Project: The project board remains in the control of this project phase. A set of authorizations are set in this phases initiation. These series of authorization are confirmed form the project sponsor. At the final activity of this phase, the project closure is confirmed. The ad-hoc direction is given to the project staff. Controlling a Stage: The project is consist of various activities that are interconnected. These interconnected processes are strategically broken down. The stages that are defined after breaking down the project are controlled and traced separately. Handling the project issues is a crucial step of this phase. This issue handling is consist of the processes like issue escalation and taking corrective responses. Managing Stage Boundaries: The stage planning is the most vital part of this phase. The project plan is updated using the in hand information. This phase is typically consisting of end of stage activities and planning for the next phase. The exception plan is also created in this phase. Managing Product Delivery: Managing the acceptance, execution and delivery of project work. Ensures that the work products are delivered to expectations and within tolerance. The processes that has been included within the process are such as accept a work package, execute a work package, deliver a work package. Closing Project: This phase is consisting of formally de-commission the project, project evaluation, identify follow up actions. This phase is also known as the project wrap-up. References: Joslin, R., Mller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1377-1392. Kerzner, H., Kerzner, H. R. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley Sons. Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology project management. Cengage Learning. Turner, R. (2016). Gower handbook of project management. Routledge.

Native Americans transition from freedom to isolation

Introduction The American civil war, which begun in 1861and ended in 1865 is regarded as one of the most violent wars experienced in the history of United States of America. At least 620,000 soldiers died during this war, which was estimated to be 2% of the American population by then.Advertising We will write a custom term paper sample on Native Americans transition from freedom to isolation specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The war caused havoc and destruction in the south wiping off about two thirds of the appraised value of the southern wealth, destroying more than half of the regions farm machinery, consuming two-fifths of southern livestock and killing one quarter of southern white males between the ages of 20 and 40 (David 1996). In the mid nineteenth century, America as a nation had conflicting ideological and cultural indifferences as it attempted to adopt the agrarian revolution traditions. Although the country had enjoye d unity for more than 60 years, political, cultural economic and social differences were the cause of the crisis in 1861 that erupted into a civil war. The consequences of the war were termed as being more positive rather than negative to the country as a whole. According to Abraham Lincoln, the civil war brought to America a new birth of freedom as the war enlightened the people about slavery and destroying slavery paved way to freedom. Reconstruction after the war was an opportunity to adopt and embrace new changes in the southern society placing Native Americans in a new redefined society life. Lifestyle of natives American The period between 1862 and 1865 was a time during which all Native Americans all over the continent were struggling for sovereignty. The civil war attracted many people dwelling in America especially the Native Americans who comprised of various tribe’s, bands and nations. During the civil war, the Native Americans served in both federal government and the confederate states of America military. Even though they participated in the war, they did so knowing very well that, they could be putting at risk their freedom, inimitable cultures and ancestral lands if at all they lost in the war. Most of the American natives lived in the west of Mississippi river. About 360,000 of the American natives were American Indians who were confined in an Indian Territory what is today known as Oklahoma. The American Indians are said to have occupied and lived in America 9,500 years before the arrival of the first Europeans explorers. From the arguments of many anthropologists and archeologist, the first people to arrive in America most probably arrived during the last ice age period of about 20,000-30,000 years ago when they used the bridge at Bering Sound in the northeastern part of Siberia to cross over to Alaska.Advertising Looking for term paper on history? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More â€Å"The name â€Å"Indian† was first referred to them by Christopher Columbus, an European explorer, who while in search of a shorter route to India mistakenly came across the islands of America which were part of the Indies in Asia hence the name Indians† (James et al 2010). Native Americans lived in small groups and tribes. Since they were not domesticated and primitive, the American Indians used their hunting skills to kill their prey which they would later bring back to their families as a source of food. Their houses were known as longhouses, which had a rectangular shape and constructed using barks covering. These homes had one thing in common, they had smoke hole in the roof, and the entrance doors were low and covered with animal’s skins, while fires in their homes burned inside their houses all the time both day and night. Everyone in these communities had specific work entitled to them in accordance to gender and age. Men were the head of the famil ies and for this reason they were responsible for bringing food they hunted, protect their families from animals and enemies and cure diseases while the women gathered forest foods and reaped corn in preparation to serve a meal for their families. Women were also responsible of nurturing their children while children helped when necessary as a way of preparing themselves for adulthood. Coming of the Europeans In the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, the Europeans started to stream immigrants into the northern and eastern parts of America. This is where they discovered a new kind of society that was very different compared to theirs (Larry, 1986). The natives themselves were amazed by the physical appearances of the Europeans since they were white in complexion compared to their reddish natural skin colour complexion. They also had a very differently mode of dressing from the natives which was deerskins with decors from shell beads or porcupine quills, feathers and other unique ornaments. Apart from that, Europeans had a unique kind of technology with them that made them even more perplexed. This wonderful technology comprised of the fire-belching harquebus and cannon, steel knives, mirrors, hawk bells, earrings swords, copper and brass kettles, and much more wonderful things. In American history, the European exploration is termed as one of the greatest event with ecological impacts since it led to the increase in population of the Americans. The increase in population is as a result of the mass movement of people to embrace ‘new world’. The movement caused conflicts between the Europeans and the natives of the American land (Bowles 2011).Advertising We will write a custom term paper sample on Native Americans transition from freedom to isolation specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Impact of European settlement For a long time since their arrival, the Europeans and the natives coexiste d peacefully as they learned different things from each other since they both had totally different lifestyles. The two societies were able to trade food, fur coats, and beads for weapons, glass while the Indian children enjoyed playing with European toys. The two societies had very contrasting ideas in relation to personal wealth and ownership. According to the Europeans, only those who were rich had the opportunity to own land and strongly believed that once this rich person dies, the land is to passed on to family signifying honor and pride this was contrary to Indians beliefs. Indians believed that property is owned by a tribe, land was a sacred asset and it belonged to no individual person but to a family as a whole. The Indians had a rule that states that ‘everything on the earth is given to all, and each person deserves their own share’. Thereafter, conflicts erupted. Europeans appeared to be oblivious to the culture and traditions of the Indians. They were arrog ant and materialist in terms of land, animals and plants in presence, a gesture that was not appealing to the Indians. This was the beginning of indifferences among the two societies. Conflicts among Native American brought about wars and desperate struggles between the native people and white people for the rich lands that became the United States (Larry, 1986). Europeans desired to conquer the new continent because of what they viewed as materialist opportunity. Their main aim was to force out the natives from their own land compelling them to relocate in order to acquire and own these rich lands for profit. The Europeans perceived this new land as a land of great opportunities hence the motive for pushing the Native Americans into the west to where the Indians were. Their arrival brought about agricultural revolution and several other environmental changes as the Europeans colonies established new and permanent settlements in the Indian country. There was a transformed world as E uropeans arrival accelerated already manifested practices of the native community (James et al 2010). These practices included; gradual collapse of chiefdoms, steady coalescence of smaller groups to large communities and introduction of new diseases.Advertising Looking for term paper on history? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More On the onset of the ‘new Indian world’ people become aware that they was scarce resources and therefore it resulted to war between themselves in order to acquire what they thought was of value to build and maintain a viable community this was the ‘human asset’. One of the main reason for the war erupting is the introduction of new technology with no way of defeating the Europeans so the natives watched helplessly their society crumble down slowly. Once the Europeans destroyed the way of life of the natives, it was difficult for many indigenous groups to maintain their traditional methods even if they wanted to. The American Indian had no powerful incentive to dream up new technologies to assist human survival. Since their arrival, the Europeans impact toward the natives was negative. The Native Americans suffered in the arms of the Europeans whereby the Native Americans were treated badly as Europeans did whatever they wished with them. At first the natives were determined to defeat their visitors but as soon as a group of the Native Americans rose to challenge the Europeans and stand up for themselves, the Europeans with their advanced technology would quickly put them down. Comparing the native’s weapons which comprised of bows and arrows and the Europeans weapons which comprised of canons and guns, the natives had a hard time battling with the Europeans. It was rare for the Native Americans to fall ill and they had built sweathouses that they used to purify themselves of ills and evil spirits. Richard (2000) notes that, â€Å"the natives had not come into contact with these kinds of diseases from the old world since they were separated from Asia, Africa and Europe by vast water bodies and ice.† Diseases like measles, pneumonia, influenza, malaria and small pox were new to these people. The Europeans are to be held responsible for bringing these diseases to the native’s lands and infecting the native people. Sin ce the diseases were introduced into America, the population of the native people dropped significantly since these people were not immune to such kind of diseases. In just a span of twenty years, about 50% of the American native population had been wiped out many of them dying because of the diseases. The increased number of deaths sparked rage among the natives as they started doubting and questioning their beliefs and religion since they could not understand why their people were dying as they had never experienced anything like these deadly diseases before the arrival of the Europeans. These made them believe that Europeans had the ability to kill and give life to people. Europeans way of life was very different from the natives. They were used to owning land and claiming its ownership arguing that Indians had no land value and no interest to owning any part of the land hence they decided to evacuate them. These conflicts brought about Indian wars, signing of an act ‘India n Removal Act’ that permitted the removal of Indians from their own land signed by President Andrew Jackson in 1830, including passing of several acts that favored European interest at that time. The war was a great disadvantage to Native Americans since they were few in numbers due to deaths brought about by lack of immunity to new diseases, their nomadic way of life prevented them from having advanced weapons, their weapons were blunt clubs and could only manage to wound and not kill their enemies. They also lacked unified of cooperation among themselves to enhance their defense. On the other hand, Europeans succeeded in conquering the natives due to their advanced weapons like the canons and guns which were considered to have played a major role. But the fact was that they only instilled fear, a psychological effect on the Native Americans as they were also well armed with Spaniards steel swords and daggers which were very sharp with the ability to slaughter the Indians. T hey also possessed horses and horsemen who could override the Indians before they could inform their fellow Indians of an invasion. These horses provided the Europeans with speed of surprise attack and a platform where Europeans could protect themselves during a fight as they could flee before their enemies could succeed in attempting to retaliate. The once peaceful community was now being faced with harsh treatment from colonialists. They had to endure several new and deadly diseases, enslavement and wars. Europeans took advantage during these wars and killed Native Americans indiscriminately. A major setback for the natives was an inconsistency in cooperation among themselves in order to build a strong defense group. This was due to the fact that there were a number of American Indians who were in support of European actions while others did not approve any of what the Europeans were doing. During the American revolutionary war, war between various American Indians tribes accelera ted (Celia, 2003). The new American settlers were struggling with the British people to support the native Americans and the nations in the east of Mississippi therefore many native Americans supported the early European settlers with the expectation of stopping the expansion of colonization in the continent. Unfortunately, the European settlers continued to expand the horizons in which they colonized either forcefully or through mutual understanding. The isolation and concentration of Indian Americans can be traced to this period after the justification of the Indian removal act in 1830. Most of the Indians who were located in the eastern parts of the Mississippi river were relocated to the western part of the river. Some of the groups relocated include: â€Å"Seneca, a group that was evicted from the state of New York and later settled in northeastern part of Oklahoma; the Sauk Indians who were evicted from Midwest and settled in a small area northern central Oklahoma; the Cherok ee who were evicted from Southeast to Oklahoma. Those Indians who refused to move west were forced to give up large tracks of their lands, which they had control over and were concentrated on increasingly small and geographically isolated areas† (Alvin, Joane Troy 1999). The population of European origin in the United States continued to increase in the late 1800 mounting more pressure on the Native Americans to give up more of their new land. The expulsion process was accomplished mostly through peaceful treaties while at times it involved violence. These new lands given to the Indians were regarded by the whites as undesirable and were located far from major population centers, trails and transportation routes. During the 19th century, United States government policies aimed at isolating and concentrating Indians in areas with scarce natural resources, detached from the emergent United States wealth. Conclusion The act signed by President Andrew Jackson in 1830, ‘the Indian Removal Act,’ essentially could be blamed for taking away any remaining opportunity of sovereignty and freedom for the Native Americans. Literature has constantly shown that these Americans left their original land by choice though this has raised a lot of criticism. Celia (2003) claimed that Native Americans endured immense pressure from European settlers to move away and due to their marginal numbers they had to concede the pressure. Since the European arrival they had been alienated mentally from their beliefs, cultures and practices as the Europeans tried to convince them to adopt to the ‘new culture’ so that they do not feel isolated but rather feel like Americans. Unfortunately, the Native American practices have been erased in an effort to make people believe that Europeans were the first people to settle in America. Towards the end of the 19th century, due to the sub-standard way of life in the isolated reservation, the federal government changed i ts primary approach to the â€Å"Indian problem† from a forced isolation to forced assimilation and now concerns about the reservation problems were resembled in many aspects. Native Americans living on reservations disproportionately lacked access to both basic and advanced technologies because poor infrastructure makes the cost of obtaining new modern technology equipment very expensive. The assimilation was achieved through allotment policy and the first allotment legislation (the Dawes Act) that was first enacted in 1887 and required that the land be sub-divided into smaller pieces so as to give the Indians an opportunity to do farming or ranching since they were the main occupations in the areas where Indians occupied. References Alvin M. J., Joane N., Troy R. J. (1999). Red power: the American Indians’ fight for freedom. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Bowles, M. (2011). A history of the United States since 1865. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint. Celia, B. (200 3). Native American power in the United States, 1783-1795. Madison, NJ: Farleigh Dickinson University Press. David, L. V. (1996). Native American Economic Development on Selected Reservations a Comparative Analysis, American journal of Economics and Sociology. Vol 4 (9) p. 9-45. James, S. O. et al (2010).The Ethnic Dimension in American History. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons. Larry, W. B. (1986). Roots of the Native American urban experience relocation policy in the 1950s. Journal of American Indian Quarterly. Vol-10, 45. Richard, F. (2000). Native Americans: the indigenous peoples of North America Living through history. Mankato, MN; Heinemann. This term paper on Native Americans transition from freedom to isolation was written and submitted by user Lia Jordan to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.